Christmas, New Years Day, Martin Luther King's Day, Memorial Day, 4 th of July, Staff Pre-service training day (3 rd week of August), Last week of August
If this is an Early/Head Start collaboration, please indicate the program option & number of Early/Head start hours:
Full day, full year center based, 3 ½ hours
6. Number of Children Served Full-Day/Year by Location, Setting & Age
Setting includes: Head Start/Early Head Start site; Child care center; Family child care homes; Public/private school system; Other (explain/describe)
Location
Setting
# Infants
# Toddlers
# Preschool
Bridgeport Child Development Center, Chicago
(capacity 153)
CC/HS Center
CC/PreK
10 CC/HS
85 CC/PreK/HS
Location
Setting
# Infants
# Toddlers
# Preschool
7. Total number of children served by organization
0-150
151-500
501-2000
2001-6000
6001+
8. Total number of children served by partner’s organization (if applicable). Note: this means an early care & education partner with whom you are collaborating. Agencies that checked “One Agency, Multiple Funders” in question 1, page 1 of this survey will NOT complete this question.
0-50
51-150
151-300
301+
9. Funding used to support full-day/year services (Check all that apply.)
Federal Early/Head Start
– grantee is Ounce of Prevention Fund
State Early Childhood Block Grant from IL State Board of Education
State Early Childhood Block Grant from School District (including Chicago Public Schools)
State Child Care Assistance Program through contract with IL Dept. of Human Services
State Child Care Assistance Program through local Child Care Resource & Referral Agency certificate program
Parent Fees
Other (Specify): ____________
10. Administration/Management (Check either yes, no or not applicable – NA – for each item.)
a. Does the collaboration have a legal written agreement/contract?
No
Yes
NA
b. Other than a contract, does the collaboration have a written partnership plan?
No
Yes
NA
c. Are there written monitoring/oversight procedures?
No
Yes
NA
d. Are there written procedures for communication among partners?
No
Yes
NA
e. Is there a written cost allocation plan/budget for the collaboration?
No
Yes
NA
f. Is there a written training/professional development plan?
No
Yes
NA
g. Do job descriptions reflect staff' collaboration responsibilities?
No
Yes
NA
h. Is there a shared computerized MIS system?
No
Yes
NA
i. Do the partners share business operations & equipment costs?
No
Yes
NA
j. Do the partners purchase transportation jointly?
No
Yes
NA
k. Is there a competitive written RFP process for partner selection?
No
Yes
NA
l. Is there an ongoing advisory group for the collaboration?
No
Yes
NA
m. Did the partnership develop out of a broad based community planning process?
No
Yes
NA
n. Are parents involved in the collaboration planning & evaluation processes?
No
Yes
NA
o. Does the collaboration have a written evaluation process?
No
Yes
NA
p. Has the agency had any audit findings in the past 3 years?
No
Yes
NA
q. When was the agency's last federal monitoring review? 2004
Were there any problems identified?
No
Yes
NA
r. When was the agency's last licensing visit? 2003
Were any problems identified?
No
Yes
NA
s. When was the agency's last DHS monitoring visit? 2005
Were any problems identified?
No
Yes
NA
11. Has the collaboration had an impact on the partner’s internal practices with regard to (check yes or no for each item):
a. Parent Decision Making
No
Yes
b. Parent Education
No
Yes
c. Parent Involvement
No
Yes
d. Family Support Services
No
Yes
e. Staff Salaries
No
Yes
f. Employee Benefits
No
Yes
g. Management Practices/Structure
No
Yes
h. Staff Training/Professional Development
No
Yes
12. Program Services (Make 2 checks for each item – 1 to indicate which partner is primarily responsible for direct service delivery and the other to indicate which children receive that service – all or just the collaboration children.)
Services Provided
Partner Responsible for Direct Service Delivery
Children Receiving Services
a. Child education services
E/HS
CC
PreK
Other
All
Collab
b. Family support services
E/HS
CC
PreK
Other
All
Collab
c. Health services
E/HS
CC
PreK
Other
All
Collab
d. Mental health services
E/HS
CC
PreK
Other
All
Collab
e. Parent education/involvement
E/HS
CC
PreK
Other
All
Collab
f. Transportation services
E/HS
CC
PreK
Other
All
Collab
g. Nutrition services
E/HS
CC
PreK
Other
All
Collab
h. Transition services
E/HS
CC
PreK
Other
All
Collab
i. Disabilities services
E/HS
CC
PreK
Other
All
Collab
j. Parent home visits
E/HS
CC
PreK
Other
All
Collab
k. Sick child care N.A.
E/HS
CC
PreK
Other
All
Collab
l. Parent conferences
E/HS
CC
PreK
Other
All
Collab
m. Non-traditional hours service N.A.
E/HS
CC
PreK
Other
All
Collab
13. Primary objectives for beginning this collaboration (check all that apply)
Enhance family health services
Enhance the quality of children’s education services
Expand services into new communities
Extend service hours
Improve & maximize staff training/professional development
Link early care & education systems in the community
Maximize funding and cost effectiveness
Maximize use of facilities
Offer increased service options
Offer parents home visits
Respond to parents’ changing needs
Serve a wider age range of children
Extend days of service
Serve siblings in one program
Provide more economically & culturally diverse programming
Increase the number of children served
Provide continuity of care
Improve staff compensation packages
14. Collaboration Development & Management
a. When did the collaboration begin?
2000 (HS);
1992 (PRE-K)
b. Are regular written management reports required to support the collaboration? If yes, explain below.
No
Yes
c. Are there regular required meetings between collaboration partners? If yes, explain below.
No
Yes
d. Is there written documentation to support the content of meetings?
No
Yes
e. Does the program/collaboration have a written planning process that includes all partners?
No
Yes
f. Does the collaboration have a written decision making process?
No
Yes
g. Why did the collaboration begin?
To enhance the quality of the services provided and extend Head Start and Pre-K programs into the community.
h. How were partners selected?
Through RFP process.
i. When there is a disagreement or conflict, how is it resolved with partners?
Meetings to resolve conflict and involving senior managers from both agencies if required.
j. When a decision has to be made about the collaboration, how is this done with partners?
Partners often are asked for input and informed of final decisions.
k. Explain how often reports & meetings are done/held:
Monthly
15. Program Components: Please answer the following questions about your collaboration program. Show in column 2 which partner is responsible for each program component. Check which children receive the program component in the last 2 columns - either all children in the classroom(s) or just the collaboration children.
Responsible Partner
Children Receiving Services
a. Does the program use a standardized curriculum?
If yes, which curriculum? Creative Curriculum
No
Yes
All
Collab
b. Does the program do child screening?
If yes, what instrument is used? ESI - R
How often are screenings done? annually
No
Yes
All
Collab
c. Does the program do ongoing child assessment? If yes, what instrument is used? Creative Curriculum Continuum
How often is assessment done? 3x per year
No
Yes
All
Collab
d. Does the program take field trips? If yes, how often? bimonthly
No
Yes
All
Collab
e. Does the program have family support staff/case managers?
If yes, what is their caseload? 34 families maximum
How often do they make home visits? annually
How frequent are family contacts? Monthly
No
Yes
All
Collab
f. BRIEFLY describe your collaboration program’s social service delivery, if you have one, for example explain your crisis intervention and/or referral process(es):
Referrals are made in collaboration with a multidisciplinary team including the disabilities coordinator, program consultants (health, mental health, nutrition) as needed, parents and teaching staff.
(No social service delivery system described.)
Answer the following questions IN AS FEW WORDS as possible, still giving a picture of how your collaboration works. Use bullet point lists whenever possible.
16. List/describe any other program components included in the collaboration that are not described in items 12 and 15 (pages 3-4).
All areas are covered above.
17. Please describe how budgeting and cost sharing among funding sources is done. How do you decide how costs will be shared? What are the financial arrangements between partners?
Cost allocations are based on number of children and specific funding source requirements. Regular payments are made upon completion of expenditure reports as per contract.
18. Please explain how your collaboration is staffed. Include classroom and support staff and tell how this is changed/different from your regular program. Who funds the staff’s salaries? Who supervises the staff and who employs them? What salaries and benefits are offered collaboration staff and is this different from other staff?
Classrooms have 3 teaching staff assigned and receive coaching and supervision from the Master Teachers who have advanced teaching credentials, experience and/or 04 certification. Head Start pays a portion of the teachers salaries and Master teachers are paid through the Pre-K collaboration. All staff are employees of Kids Hope United. Family support staff positions are new since Head Start and a portion of their salaries are paid by Head Start also. All staff benefits are the same with the exception of the Head Start required COLA increases which only staff on the Head Start budget receives.
19. Please tell about your written agreement, if you have one. Include: what the agreement covers (section titles); term (what the time period is); if finances are part of the agreement and how these were figured; etc.
The Head Start term is from January to December and the Pre-K term is July – June. Written agreements are in place for all funding streams and include the General Terms and Conditions, Fiscal Terms and Conditions, Partner Agency Responsibilities, Suspension and Termination procedures & various attachments. Finances are based upon approved budget amounts.
20. Please describe the training system for your collaboration. Include what kind of training is done, how costs are shared among funding sources and/or partners, and how it has changed since the collaboration began.
Monthly training is provided by funders as well as regular Pre-service training. The funder pays for this training. Local training is also provided through in-service training and paid for by the agency. There are more opportunities for training outside of the center since the collaboration.
21. Please give any other details about your collaboration that you believe are important, but not covered elsewhere.
N/A
22. If you could start your collaboration over again, knowing what you know now, what would you do differently?
Nothing.
23. What advice do you have for agencies/homes starting new collaborations?
Be flexible, open to change and growth (and the headaches that come with it!) and have regular opportunities for communication and sharing with partners. Learn from other program's struggles with this process. There are many benefits for the families, children and staff!
Copyright 2005 Collaboration Model Description. Template.
HS State Collab Office.10.05