Profile Disclaimer

1. One Agency Multiple Funders: Casa Central

PDF

Early Care & Education Program Collaboration Model Description

Agency/Home Name: Casa Centrál Children’s Services
Contact Person: Ellen Chavez
Address: 1343 N. California, Chicago, IL 60622
Phone: 773-645-2368
Email Address: echavez@casacentral.org

1. Model (Please check only one. Complete separate forms for different collaboration models.)

One Agency, Multiple Funders
A single program or agency blends/braids funds and program requirements from multiple sources at a single site.
Multiple Agencies Partner – various school districts & child care centers
Two or more agencies, which are separate legal entities, partner to serve children at a single site.
Partnering with Family Child Care
A program or agency partners with family child care home providers.

2. Collaboration Type (Check all that apply to this collaboration model.)

Child Care/Early Head Start
Child Care/Head Start
Child Care/PreK
Child Care/Head Start/PreK
Head Start/PreK

3. Partnership Initiated By

Child Care
Head Start/Early Head Start
PreK
Other (specify): Delegate agency – Ounce of Prevention Fund is HS grantee
  ______________________________________________________

4. Demographics

Urban
Rural
Suburban

5. Schedule

Hours per day: 11 hrs/day
From: 7 a.m.
To: 6 p.m.
Days/Weeks per year: 5 days/week; 245 days/year
Holidays or other time “off” or closed: 10 holidays + 4 planning days
If this is an Early/Head Start collaboration, please indicate the program option & number of Early/Head start hours: Center based program option; HS part, CC full

6. Number of Children Served Full-Day/Year by Location, Setting & Age
Setting includes: Head Start/Early Head Start site; Child care center; Family child care homes; Public/private school system; Other (explain/describe)

Location
Setting
# Infants
# Toddlers
# Preschool
1343 N. California, Chicago 60622
HS/CC Center
114 HS/CC
2222 N. Kedzie Boulevard, Chicago 60647
HS/CC Center
80 HS/CC
         
         
         
         
Location
Setting
# Infants
# Toddlers
# Preschool
         
         
         
         
         
         

7. Total number of children served by organization

0-150
151-500
501-2000
2001-6000
6001+

8. Total number of children served by partner’s organization (if applicable). Note: this means an early care & education partner with whom you are collaborating. Agencies that checked “One Agency, Multiple Funders” in question 1, page 1 of this survey will NOT complete this question.

0-50
51-150
151-300
301+

9. Funding used to support full-day/year services (Check all that apply.)

Federal Early/Head Start
State Early Childhood Block Grant from IL State Board of Education
State Early Childhood Block Grant from School District (including Chicago Public Schools)
State Child Care Assistance Program through contract with IL Dept. of Human Services
State Child Care Assistance Program through local Child Care Resource & Referral Agency certificate program
Parent Fees
Other (Specify): CACFP

10. Administration/Management (Check either yes, no or not applicable – NA – for each item.)

a. Does the collaboration have a legal written agreement/contract? No Yes NA
b. Other than a contract, does the collaboration have a written partnership plan? No Yes NA
c. Are there written monitoring/oversight procedures? No Yes NA
d. Are there written procedures for communication among partners? No Yes NA
e. Is there a written cost allocation plan/budget for the collaboration? No Yes NA
f. Is there a written training/professional development plan? No Yes NA
g. Do job descriptions reflect staff' collaboration responsibilities? No Yes NA
h. Is there a shared computerized MIS system? No Yes NA
i. Do the partners share business operations & equipment costs? No Yes NA
j. Do the partners purchase transportation jointly? No Yes NA
k. Is there a competitive written RFP process for partner selection? No Yes NA
l. Is there an ongoing advisory group for the collaboration? Policy Committee/Council No Yes NA
m. Did the partnership develop out of a broad based community planning process? No Yes NA
n. Are parents involved in the collaboration planning & evaluation processes? Policy Committee/Council No Yes NA
o. Does the collaboration have a written evaluation process? No Yes NA
p. Has the agency had any audit findings in the past 3 years? No Yes NA
q. When was the agency's last federal monitoring review? 2005
Were there any problems identified? No Yes NA
r. When was the agency's last licensing visit? 2005
Were any problems identified? No Yes NA
s. When was the agency's last DHS monitoring visit? 2005
Were any problems identified? No Yes NA

11. Has the collaboration had an impact on the partner’s internal practices with regard to (check yes or no for each item):

a. Parent Decision Making No Yes
b. Parent Education No Yes
c. Parent Involvement No Yes
d. Family Support Services No Yes
e. Staff Salaries No Yes
f. Employee Benefits No Yes
g. Management Practices/Structure No Yes
h. Staff Training/Professional Development No Yes

12. Program Services (Make 2 checks for each item – 1 to indicate which partner is primarily responsible for direct service delivery and the other to indicate which children receive that service – all or just the collaboration children.)

Services Provided
Partner Responsible for Direct Service Delivery
Children Receiving Services
a. Child education services

E/HS

CC

PreK

Other

All

Collab
b. Family support services

E/HS

CC

PreK

Other

All

Collab
c. Health services

E/HS

CC

PreK

Other

All

Collab
d. Mental health services

E/HS

CC

PreK

Other

All

Collab
e. Parent education/involvement

E/HS

CC

PreK

Other

All

Collab
f. Transportation services

E/HS

CC

PreK

Other

All

Collab
g. Nutrition services

E/HS

CC

PreK

Other

All

Collab
h. Transition services

E/HS

CC

PreK

Other

All

Collab
i. Disabilities services

E/HS

CC

PreK

Other

All

Collab
j. Parent home visits

E/HS

CC

PreK

Other

All

Collab
k. Sick child care N.A.

E/HS

CC

PreK

Other

All

Collab
l. Parent conferences

E/HS

CC

PreK

Other

All

Collab
m. Non-traditional hours service N.A.

E/HS

CC

PreK

Other

All

Collab

13. Primary objectives for beginning this collaboration (check all that apply)

Enhance family health services

Enhance the quality of children’s education services
Expand services into new communities
Extend service hours
Improve & maximize staff training/professional development
Link early care & education systems in the community
Maximize funding and cost effectiveness
Maximize use of facilities
Offer increased service options
Offer parents home visits
Respond to parents’ changing needs
Serve a wider age range of children
Extend days of service
Serve siblings in one program
Provide more economically & culturally diverse programming
Increase the number of children served
Provide continuity of care
Improve staff compensation packages

14. Collaboration Development & Management

a. When did the collaboration begin?
19__?
b. Are regular written management reports required to support the collaboration? If yes, explain below. No Yes
c. Are there regular required meetings between collaboration partners? If yes, explain below. No Yes
d. Is there written documentation to support the content of meetings? No Yes
e. Does the program/collaboration have a written planning process that includes all partners? No Yes
f. Does the collaboration have a written decision making process? No Yes
g. Why did the collaboration begin? See #13.
h. How were partners selected?
i. When there is a disagreement or conflict, how is it resolved with partners? Through the agency’s Director of Grantee Operations.
j. When a decision has to be made about the collaboration, how is this done with partners? Through monthly Directors’ meetings.
k. Explain how often reports & meetings are done/held: Monthly written reports/daily enrollment & attendance reports/monthly directors’ & content coordinator meetings.

15. Program Components: Please answer the following questions about your collaboration program. Show in column 2 which partner is responsible for each program component. Check which children receive the program component in the last 2 columns - either all children in the classroom(s) or just the collaboration children.

   
Responsible Partner
Children Receiving Services

a. Does the program use a standardized curriculum?

If yes, which curriculum? Creative Curriculum & Portage Parenting Program

No
Yes
 
All
Collab

b. Does the program do child screening?

If yes, what instrument is used? ESI

How often are screenings done? Annually

No
Yes
 
All
Collab

c. Does the program do ongoing child assessment? If yes, what instrument is used? Creative Curriculum Continuum & Portage Checklist

How often is assessment done? 3X/year

No
Yes
 
All
Collab
d. Does the program take field trips? If yes, how often? Monthly No
Yes
 
All
Collab

e. Does the program have family support staff/case managers?

If yes, what is their caseload? 1:40

How often do they make home visits? 2X/year

How frequent are family contacts? Monthly

No
Yes
 
All
Collab

f. BRIEFLY describe your collaboration program’s social service delivery, if you have one, for example explain your crisis intervention and/or referral process(es):

Each site has family support staff assigned to 2 classrooms (1:40).  Family assessments are done at enrollment &on  first home visits the family action plan is developed, according to Head Start timeframes/Performance Standards – reviewed 3X/year.  Referrals/crises handled by family support staff, as needed.

Answer the following questions IN AS FEW WORDS as possible, still giving a picture of how your collaboration works. Use bullet point lists whenever possible.

16. List/describe any other program components included in the collaboration that are not described in items 12 and 15 (pages 3-4).

Casa is a delegate of the Ounce of Prevention for Head Start & a site administered child care site and blends both services into the 2-5 year old program.  Casa also has 2 classrooms for 2 year olds at one site not supported by EHS.

17. Please describe how budgeting and cost sharing among funding sources is done. How do you decide how costs will be shared? What are the financial arrangements between partners?

The education, disabilities & family support portions of the program are charged to Head Start.  Management, nutrition, transportation & administrative support are aligned with child care.  Staff & program costs will be at 100% on one contract or 50% on each.

18. Please explain how your collaboration is staffed. Include classroom and support staff and tell how this is changed/different from your regular program. Who funds the staff’s salaries? Who supervises the staff and who employs them? What salaries and benefits are offered collaboration staff and is this different from other staff?

Head Start:  lead teachers, education coordinator, family support staff, 50% Site Directors.

Child Care: drivers, kitchen staff, administrative assistant, teacher assistants (50%) & aides, teachers in 2 year old classroom.

19. Please tell about your written agreement, if you have one. Include: what the agreement covers (section titles); term (what the time period is); if finances are part of the agreement and how these were figured; etc.

Annual contract with Ounce for Head Start (January 1 through Dec. 31); based on cost/child; contract specifies staffing patterns, curriculum usage and other Head Start Program Performance Standards.

20. Please describe the training system for your collaboration. Include what kind of training is done, how costs are shared among funding sources and/or partners, and how it has changed since the collaboration began.

Grantee (Ounce): monthly content coordinator/director meetings; annual pre-service conference; other education/disability/family support training, as needed.

Casa: annual Head Start/Child Care mandated training calendar.

EQUIP grant to work with Erikson Inst.

21. Please give any other details about your collaboration that you believe are important, but not covered elsewhere.

Ounce monitoring/technical assistance/training has really helped to improve the program & push it from child care into early learning.  Monthly meetings are really great.

22. If you could start your collaboration over again, knowing what you know now, what would you do differently?

A better alignment of all the competing/conflicting requirements.

23. What advice do you have for agencies/homes starting new collaborations?

Eligibility requirements for HS/CC/State PreK conflict & will impact enrollment & retention as well as program operations & documentation.

The level of outcomes, activity & content expertise required has changed this program (HS) & yet even with child care funds, we still are being paid at the paraprofessional level.

 

Copyright 2005 Collaboration Model Description. Template.
HS State Collab Office.10.05