1. Model (Please check only one. Complete separate forms for different collaboration models.)
One Agency, Multiple Funders – City of Chicago Children & Youth Services (CYS) delegate agency A single program or agency blends/braids funds and program requirements from multiple sources at a single site.
Multiple Agencies Partner Two or more agencies, which are separate legal entities, partner to serve children at a single site.
Partnering with Family Child Care A program or agency partners with family child care home providers.
2. Collaboration Type (Check all that apply to this collaboration model.)
Child Care/Early Head Start
Child Care/Head Start
Child Care/PreK
Child Care/Head Start/PreK
Head Start/PreK
3. Partnership Initiated By
Child Care
Head Start/Early Head Start
PreK
Other (specify): _________________________________________
If this is an Early/Head Start collaboration, please indicate the program option & number of Early/Head start hours:
Part day center-based HS funding; full day programming
6. Number of Children Served Full-Day/Year by Location, Setting & Age
Setting includes: Head Start/Early Head Start site; Child care center; Family child care homes; Public/private school system; Other (explain/describe)
Location
Setting
# Infants
# Toddlers
# Preschool
Easter Seal – 2345 W. North
HS/CC - Center
238
Near South – 3630 S. Wells
EHS
24
Location
Setting
# Infants
# Toddlers
# Preschool
7. Total number of children served by organization
0-150
151-500
501-2000
2001-6000
6001+
8. Total number of children served by partner’s organization (if applicable). Note: this means an early care & education partner with whom you are collaborating. Agencies that checked “One Agency, Multiple Funders” in question 1, page 1 of this survey will NOT complete this question.
0-50
51-150
151-300
301+
9. Funding used to support full-day/year services (Check all that apply.)
Federal Early/Head Start
State Early Childhood Block Grant from IL State Board of Education
State Early Childhood Block Grant from School District (including Chicago Public Schools)
State Child Care Assistance Program through contract with IL Dept. of Human Services – via Chicago CYS contract
State Child Care Assistance Program through local Child Care Resource & Referral Agency certificate program
Parent Fees
Other (Specify): ____________
10. Administration/Management (Check either yes, no or not applicable – NA – for each item.)
a. Does the collaboration have a legal written agreement/contract?
No
Yes
NA
b. Other than a contract, does the collaboration have a written partnership plan?
No
Yes
NA
c. Are there written monitoring/oversight procedures?
No
Yes
NA
d. Are there written procedures for communication among partners?
No
Yes
NA
e. Is there a written cost allocation plan/budget for the collaboration?
No
Yes
NA
f. Is there a written training/professional development plan?
No
Yes
NA
g. Do job descriptions reflect staff' collaboration responsibilities?
No
Yes
NA
h. Is there a shared computerized MIS system?
No
Yes
NA
i. Do the partners share business operations & equipment costs?
No
Yes
NA
j. Do the partners purchase transportation jointly?
No
Yes
NA
k. Is there a competitive written RFP process for partner selection?
No
Yes
NA
l. Is there an ongoing advisory group for the collaboration?
No
Yes
NA
m. Did the partnership develop out of a broad based community planning process?
No
Yes
NA
n. Are parents involved in the collaboration planning & evaluation processes?
No
Yes
NA
o. Does the collaboration have a written evaluation process?
No
Yes
NA
p. Has the agency had any audit findings in the past 3 years?
No
Yes
NA
q. When was the agency's last federal monitoring review? 4/05 (grantee)
Were there any problems identified?
No
Yes
NA
r. When was the agency's last licensing visit? 2005
Were any problems identified?
No
Yes
NA
s. When was the agency's last DHS monitoring visit?_____________
Were any problems identified?
No
Yes
NA
11. Has the collaboration had an impact on the partner’s internal practices with regard to (check yes or no for each item):
a. Parent Decision Making
No
Yes
b. Parent Education
No
Yes
c. Parent Involvement
No
Yes
d. Family Support Services
No
Yes
e. Staff Salaries
No
Yes
f. Employee Benefits
No
Yes
g. Management Practices/Structure
No
Yes
h. Staff Training/Professional Development
No
Yes
12. Program Services (Make 2 checks for each item – 1 to indicate which partner is primarily responsible for direct service delivery and the other to indicate which children receive that service – all or just the collaboration children.)
Services Provided
Partner Responsible for Direct Service Delivery
Children Receiving Services
a. Child education services
E/HS
CC
PreK
Other
All
Collab
b. Family support services
E/HS
CC
PreK
Other
All
Collab
c. Health services
E/HS
CC
PreK
Other
All
Collab
d. Mental health services
E/HS
CC
PreK
Other
All
Collab
e. Parent education/involvement
E/HS
CC
PreK
Other
All
Collab
f. Transportation services
E/HS
CC
PreK
Other
All
Collab
g. Nutrition services
E/HS
CC
PreK
Other
All
Collab
h. Transition services
E/HS
CC
PreK
Other
All
Collab
i. Disabilities services
E/HS
CC
PreK
Other
All
Collab
j. Parent home visits
E/HS
CC
PreK
Other
All
Collab
k. Sick child care
E/HS
CC
PreK
Other
All
Collab
l. Parent conferences
E/HS
CC
PreK
Other
All
Collab
m. Non-traditional hours service NA
E/HS
CC
PreK
Other
All
Collab
13. Primary objectives for beginning this collaboration (check all that apply)
Enhance family health services
Enhance the quality of children’s education services
Expand services into new communities
Extend service hours
Improve & maximize staff training/professional development
Link early care & education systems in the community
Maximize funding and cost effectiveness
Maximize use of facilities
Offer increased service options
Offer parents home visits
Respond to parents’ changing needs
Serve a wider age range of children
Extend days of service
Serve siblings in one program
Provide more economically & culturally diverse programming
Increase the number of children served
Provide continuity of care
Improve staff compensation packages
14. Collaboration Development & Management
a. When did the collaboration begin?
b. Are regular written management reports required to support the collaboration? If yes, explain below.
No
Yes
c. Are there regular required meetings between collaboration partners? If yes, explain below.
No
Yes
d. Is there written documentation to support the content of meetings?
No
Yes
e. Does the program/collaboration have a written planning process that includes all partners?
No
Yes
f. Does the collaboration have a written decision making process?
No
Yes
g. Why did the collaboration begin? To establish full day child care for income eligible families.
h. How were partners selected? Chicago CYS selects agencies based on their capacity level as well as the corporate structure of the agency.
i. When there is a disagreement or conflict, how is it resolved with partners? CYS’s partners are required to align their programs with the Head Start Program Performance Standards and thus follow the shared governance protocol that has been established.
j. When a decision has to be made about the collaboration, how is this done with partners? Through meetings with the Executive Director, Board, and parents.
k. Explain how often reports & meetings are done/held: Chicago CYS convenes quarterly meetings with all agencies that provide program updates as well as changes in internal policies and procedures. After every site visit to the agency, CYS must complete a site visit form that will denote next steps, resource and technical assistance needs.
15. Program Components: Please answer the following questions about your collaboration program. Show in column 2 which partner is responsible for each program component. Check which children receive the program component in the last 2 columns - either all children in the classroom(s) or just the collaboration children.
Responsible Partner
Children Receiving Services
a. Does the program use a standardized curriculum?
If yes, which curriculum? High Scope
No
Yes
Head Start
All
Collab
b. Does the program do child screening?
If yes, what instrument is used? ESI-R
How often are screenings done? Beginning of program
No
Yes
Head Start
All
Collab
c. Does the program do ongoing child assessment? If yes, what instrument is used? Ages & Stages
How often is assessment done? Annually
No
Yes
Head Start
All
Collab
d. Does the program take field trips? If yes, how often? Monthly
No
Yes
Head Start
All
Collab
e. Does the program have family support staff/case managers?
If yes, what is their caseload? 40
How often do they make home visits? 2 times per year
How frequent are family contacts? Monthly
No
Yes
Head Start
All
Collab
f. BRIEFLY describe your collaboration program’s social service delivery, if you have one, for example explain your crisis intervention and/or referral process(es):
In response to our communities, Easter Seals Metropolitan Chicago provides comprehensive services for individuals with disabilities or other special needs & their families to improve quality of life & maximize independence. Children are referred to Easter Seals by their school districts. Appropriately certified & qualified professionals implement the services & programs identified on the child’s Individual Educational Plan (IEP). The children are transported to an Easter Seals’ school by the school district. The school provides a hot breakfast & lunch. The day schools provide an extended school program during the summer months. Easter Seals’ Near South Side Child Devt. Center, located inside Robert S. Abbott Elementary School, provides Early & Head Start services and programming provides a continuum of services to children from 6 weeks of age through 8th grade.
Answer the following questions IN AS FEW WORDS as possible, still giving a picture of how your collaboration works. Use bullet point lists whenever possible.
16. List/describe any other program components included in the collaboration that are not described in items 12 and 15 (pages 3-4).
17. Please describe how budgeting and cost sharing among funding sources is done. How do you decide how costs will be shared? What are the financial arrangements between partners?
Cost analyses are done on a yearly basis that shows the cost allocation and resources assigned to each program type. CYS provides the Head Start and Child Care funds.
18. Please explain how your collaboration is staffed. Include classroom and support staff and tell how this is changed/different from your regular program. Who funds the staff’s salaries? Who supervises the staff and who employs them? What salaries and benefits are offered collaboration staff and is this different from other staff?
Each classroom has 3 teaching staff (1 teacher and 2 assistants/aides), janitor, cook/food aide, site director, and social service staff. Cost sharing is aligned with the various funding streams. Staff has the opportunity to be involved in other agency programs such as health insurance, vacation and sick pay.
19. Please tell about your written agreement, if you have one. Include: what the agreement covers (section titles); term (what the time period is); if finances are part of the agreement and how these were figured; etc.
CYS has a contract with the agency that shows the allocation of funds for each program types that agency has.
20. Please describe the training system for your collaboration. Include what kind of training is done, how costs are shared among funding sources and/or partners, and how it has changed since the collaboration began.
CYS provides training at the grantee level to support the systems/services of Head Start as well as child care requirements and procedures to enroll eligible children and families. Costs are shared across funding streams depending on the topic of the training.
21. Please give any other details about your collaboration that you believe are important, but not covered elsewhere.
22. If you could start your collaboration over again, knowing what you know now, what would you do differently?
Advocate for annual increases in funding.
23. What advice do you have for agencies/homes starting new collaborations?
Establish an effective communication system with the grantee and funders that will afford the opportunities for agencies to gain information and make programmatic decisions.
Copyright 2005 Collaboration Model Description. Template.
HS State Collab Office.10.05