PreK | Profile 3A | Profile 3B | Profile 3C | Profile 3D | Profile 3E

3. Partnering with Family Child Care: Skip A Long PreK

Early Care & Education Program Collaboration Model Description

Agency/Home Name: Skip-A-Long Child Development Services, Home Child Care Network
Contact Person: Laurel Walker
Address: 1609 4th Street, Building 2, Rock Island, IL 61201
Phone: 309-764-8110
Email Address: LWalker@skip-a-long.com

1. Model (Please check only one. Complete separate forms for different collaboration models.)

One Agency, Multiple Funders
A single program or agency blends/braids funds and program requirements from multiple sources at a single site.
Multiple Agencies Partner
Two or more agencies, which are separate legal entities, partner to serve children at a single site.
Partnering with Family Child Care
A program or agency partners with family child care home providers.

2. Collaboration Type (Check all that apply to this collaboration model.)

Child Care/Early Head Start
Child Care/Head Start
Child Care/PreK
Child Care/Head Start/PreK
Head Start/PreK

3. Partnership Initiated By

Child Care
Head Start/Early Head Start
PreK
Other (specify): _________________________________________
  ______________________________________________________

4. Demographics

Urban
Rural
Suburban

5. Schedule

Hours per day:

Extended hours  - more than 11/day (2.5 PreK /week/home)  Schedule varies by home.

PreK Hours: 9 – 11:30 a.m. and 2-4:30 p.m.

From: 5 days a week, year round, 52 weeks
To: _________
Days/Weeks per year: _________
Holidays or other time “off” or closed: 4th July; Labor Day; Thanksgiving Day and day after; Christmas Eve and Christmas Day; NY Day; Memorial Day
If this is an Early/Head Start collaboration, please indicate the program option & number of Early/Head start hours: _________

6. Number of Children Served Full-Day/Year by Location, Setting & Age
Setting includes: Head Start/Early Head Start site; Child care center; Family child care homes; Public/private school system; Other (explain/describe)

Location
Setting
# Infants
# Toddlers
# Preschool
Rock Island Campus – 1609 4th Street, RI 61201 4 Child Care Homes – East Moline, Moline & 2 in Rock Island    

20 PreK
(among 4 homes)

         
         
         
         
         
Location
Setting
# Infants
# Toddlers
# Preschool
         
         
         
         
         
         

7. Total number of children served by organization

0-150
151-500
501-2000
2001-6000
6001+

8. Total number of children served by partner’s organization (if applicable). Note: this means an early care & education partner with whom you are collaborating. Agencies that checked “One Agency, Multiple Funders” in question 1, page 1 of this survey will NOT complete this question.

0-50
51-150
151-300
301+

9. Funding used to support full-day/year services (Check all that apply.)

Federal Early/Head Start
State Early Childhood Block Grant from IL State Board of Education
State Early Childhood Block Grant from School District (including Chicago Public Schools)
State Child Care Assistance Program through contract with IL Dept. of Human Services
State Child Care Assistance Program through local Child Care Resource & Referral Agency certificate program
Parent Fees
Other (Specify): DCFS; Fund Raising

10. Administration/Management (Check either yes, no or not applicable – NA – for each item.)

a. Does the collaboration have a legal written agreement/contract? No Yes NA
b. Other than a contract, does the collaboration have a written partnership plan? No Yes NA
c. Are there written monitoring/oversight procedures? No Yes NA
d. Are there written procedures for communication among partners? No Yes NA
e. Is there a written cost allocation plan/budget for the collaboration? No Yes NA
f. Is there a written training/professional development plan? No Yes NA
g. Do job descriptions reflect staff' collaboration responsibilities? No Yes NA
h. Is there a shared computerized MIS system? No Yes NA
i. Do the partners share business operations & equipment costs? No Yes NA
j. Do the partners purchase transportation jointly? No Yes NA
k. Is there a competitive written RFP process for partner selection? No Yes NA
l. Is there an ongoing advisory group for the collaboration? No Yes NA
m. Did the partnership develop out of a broad based community planning process? No Yes NA
n. Are parents involved in the collaboration planning & evaluation processes? No Yes NA
o. Does the collaboration have a written evaluation process? No Yes NA
p. Has the agency had any audit findings in the past 3 years? No Yes NA
q. When was the agency's last federal monitoring review?________
Were there any problems identified? No Yes NA
r. When was the agency's last licensing visit?________________
Were any problems identified? No Yes NA
s. When was the agency's last DHS monitoring visit?_____________
Were any problems identified? No Yes NA

11. Has the collaboration had an impact on the partner’s internal practices with regard to (check yes or no for each item):

a. Parent Decision Making No Yes
b. Parent Education No Yes
c. Parent Involvement No Yes
d. Family Support Services No Yes
e. Staff Salaries No Yes
f. Employee Benefits No Yes
g. Management Practices/Structure No Yes
h. Staff Training/Professional Development No Yes

12. Program Services (Make 2 checks for each item – 1 to indicate which partner is primarily responsible for direct service delivery and the other to indicate which children receive that service – all or just the collaboration children.)

Services Provided
Partner Responsible for Direct Service Delivery
Children Receiving Services
a. Child education services

E/HS

CC

PreK

Other

All

Collab
b. Family support services

E/HS

CC

PreK

Other

All

Collab
c. Health services

E/HS

CC

PreK

Other

All

Collab
d. Mental health services N.A.

E/HS

CC

PreK

Other

All

Collab
e. Parent education/involvement

E/HS

CC

PreK

Other

All

Collab
f. Transportation services

E/HS

CC

PreK

Other

All

Collab
g. Nutrition services

E/HS

CC

PreK

Other

All

Collab
h. Transition services N.A.

E/HS

CC

PreK

Other

All

Collab
i. Disabilities services

E/HS

CC

PreK

Other

All

Collab
j. Parent home visits

E/HS

CC

PreK

Other

All

Collab
k. Sick child care

E/HS

CC

PreK

Other

All

Collab
l. Parent conferences

E/HS

CC

PreK

Other

All

Collab
m. Non-traditional hours service

E/HS

CC

PreK

Other

All

Collab

13. Primary objectives for beginning this collaboration (check all that apply)

Enhance family health services

Enhance the quality of children’s education services
Expand services into new communities
Extend service hours
Improve & maximize staff training/professional development
Link early care & education systems in the community
Maximize funding and cost effectiveness
Maximize use of facilities
Offer increased service options
Offer parents home visits
Respond to parents’ changing needs
Serve a wider age range of children
Extend days of service
Serve siblings in one program
Provide more economically & culturally diverse programming
Increase the number of children served
Provide continuity of care
Improve staff compensation packages

14. Collaboration Development & Management

a. When did the collaboration begin? 2003
b. Are regular written management reports required to support the collaboration? If yes, explain below. No Yes
c. Are there regular required meetings between collaboration partners? If yes, explain below. No Yes
d. Is there written documentation to support the content of meetings? No Yes
e. Does the program/collaboration have a written planning process that includes all partners? No Yes
f. Does the collaboration have a written decision making process? No Yes

g. Why did the collaboration begin?

The ROE pulled together a small handful of early childhood providers to generally discuss common issues. Out of that our local Coalition was formed, which two years later decided to pool together and write the ECBG together, believing that “together we are better.”

h. How were partners selected?

Attitude, knowledge, willingness to work together, something to bring to the table.  Then, each classroom of 20 PreK At Risk children was awarded on an RFP basis with outside objective readers of each application.

i. When there is a disagreement or conflict, how is it resolved with partners?

One of us calls for a meeting and it is talked through.  We now have written by laws that address conflict  resolution.

j. When a decision has to be made about the collaboration, how is this done with partners?

Follow Roberts Rules for voting - each partner has 1 vote

 

k. Explain how often reports & meetings are done/held:

Monthly meetings with Directors of the classrooms, monthly meetings of the oversight group and monthly meetings of the 04 teachers with the fiscal partner, ROE.

15. Program Components: Please answer the following questions about your collaboration program. Show in column 2 which partner is responsible for each program component. Check which children receive the program component in the last 2 columns - either all children in the classroom(s) or just the collaboration children.

   
Responsible Partner
Children Receiving Services

a. Does the program use a standardized curriculum?

If yes, which curriculum?

Creative Curriculum

No
Yes
 
All
Collab

b. Does the program do child screening?

If yes, what instrument is used? Ages/Stages

How often are screenings done?
annual/on enrollment

No
Yes
 
All
Collab

c. Does the program do ongoing child assessment? If yes, what instrument is used? Work Sampling

How often is assessment done? 2X/year year

No
Yes
 
All
Collab
d. Does the program take field trips? If yes, how often? 8X/year No
Yes
 
All
Collab

e. Does the program have family support staff/case managers?

If yes, what is their caseload? :80

How often do they make home visits? 2X/year

How frequent are family contacts? weekly

No
Yes
 
All
Collab

f. BRIEFLY describe your collaboration program’s social service delivery, if you have one, for example explain your crisis intervention and/or referral process(es):

Skip-A-Long staffs a Family Service Provider who conducts enrollment, determines eligibility & links families to services.  This person develops a relationship with the families. So in any time of family need, that staff is generally the individual that responds/meets with the family.

Answer the following questions IN AS FEW WORDS as possible, still giving a picture of how your collaboration works. Use bullet point lists whenever possible.

16. List/describe any other program components included in the collaboration that are not described in items 12 and 15 (pages 3-4).

Nurse on Staff; conduct separate outcomes measurement, assessing kindergarten readiness.

17. Please describe how budgeting and cost sharing among funding sources is done. How do you decide how costs will be shared? What are the financial arrangements between partners?

Partners discuss & determine their group/individual needs—come to consensus, draft the budget, which is then presented to the oversight committee.  ROE secures the money and distributes according to budget to each classroom partner who is then responsible for proper documentation.

18. Please explain how your collaboration is staffed. Include classroom and support staff and tell how this is changed/different from your regular program. Who funds the staff’s salaries? Who supervises the staff and who employs them? What salaries and benefits are offered collaboration staff and is this different from other staff?

Collaboration homes have one 04 certified teacher that conducts two 1- hour sessions in each home each week, plus an extra 2.5 hour session per home every 4th week, in addition to regular staffing in the licensed homes.  Skip-A-Long’s Home Network Director supervises both the certified teacher and the homes;  ROE also supervises the certified teacher, who is paid a higher salary and receives greater benefits than regular child care.

19. Please tell about your written agreement, if you have one. Include: what the agreement covers (section titles); term (what the time period is); if finances are part of the agreement and how these were figured; etc.

Written agreement states the purpose, compliance, decision-making, management, equipment ownership, liability insurance, record keeping, monitoring/evaluation, public relations, conflict of interest, changes, dispute resolution, renewal/termination, notices - signed by all partners in the Coalition’s PreK collaboration.  Program Policies and Procedures Manual addresses organization, curriculum and instruction, personnel, parents, assessment and accountability, early learning enhanced experience, staff development plan, division of responsibilities.  Also have written salary agreement that the teaching staff and directors are required to sign in order to receive additional PreK pay for these additional duties.  They are the ONLY child care staff whose salary is augmented with PreK funding.

20. Please describe the training system for your collaboration. Include what kind of training is done, how costs are shared among funding sources and/or partners, and how it has changed since the collaboration began.

Partners agree on training, presenters, & level needed at the beginning of the year.  ROE coordinates training; each classroom partner pays their share.  In the third year, the level of training has advanced because the staff knowledge base is increased, however, entry-level training is still offered for new staff.  Training & staff development are one of the hallmarks of this collaboration’s success.  Everyone has the opportunity to better their knowledge and apply it.  Regular child care teachers received 60 clock hours last year on top of the regular 15 hours always provided.  This professional development has stimulated staff to further their education.

21. Please give any other details about your collaboration that you believe are important, but not covered elsewhere.

Our collaboration is still so different and new to us as we are completely pooling our knowledge, resources to make this successful.  We worked through our different perceptions and turf issues/barriers so that we are a diverse group functioning as one.

22. If you could start your collaboration over again, knowing what you know now, what would you do differently?

Clarify the roles of all partners; seek 501c3 status.

23. What advice do you have for agencies/homes starting new collaborations?

While it is more difficult and time consuming, I believe we offer a better service in the final analysis.  Open and regular communications should be spelled out and adhered to.  Seek out partners like and unlike you to bring diversity to the table.  Take the opportunity to learn/share with one another.

Copyright 2005 Collaboration Model Description. Template.
HS State Collab Office.10.05

PDF