Extended hours - more than 11/day (2.5 PreK /week/home) Schedule varies by home.
PreK Hours: 9 – 11:30 a.m. and 2-4:30 p.m.
From:
5 days a week, year round, 52 weeks
To:
_________
Days/Weeks per year:
_________
Holidays or other time “off” or closed:
4th July; Labor Day; Thanksgiving Day and day after; Christmas Eve and Christmas Day; NY Day; Memorial Day
If this is an Early/Head Start collaboration, please indicate the program option & number of Early/Head start hours:
_________
6. Number of Children Served Full-Day/Year by Location, Setting & Age
Setting includes: Head Start/Early Head Start site; Child care center; Family child care homes; Public/private school system; Other (explain/describe)
Location
Setting
# Infants
# Toddlers
# Preschool
Rock Island Campus – 1609 4th Street, RI 61201
4 Child Care Homes – East Moline, Moline & 2 in Rock Island
20 PreK
(among 4 homes)
Location
Setting
# Infants
# Toddlers
# Preschool
7. Total number of children served by organization
0-150
151-500
501-2000
2001-6000
6001+
8. Total number of children served by partner’s organization (if applicable). Note: this means an early care & education partner with whom you are collaborating. Agencies that checked “One Agency, Multiple Funders” in question 1, page 1 of this survey will NOT complete this question.
0-50
51-150
151-300
301+
9. Funding used to support full-day/year services (Check all that apply.)
Federal Early/Head Start
State Early Childhood Block Grant from IL State Board of Education
State Early Childhood Block Grant from School District (including Chicago Public Schools)
State Child Care Assistance Program through contract with IL Dept. of Human Services
State Child Care Assistance Program through local Child Care Resource & Referral Agency certificate program
Parent Fees
Other (Specify): DCFS; Fund Raising
10. Administration/Management (Check either yes, no or not applicable – NA – for each item.)
a. Does the collaboration have a legal written agreement/contract?
No
Yes
NA
b. Other than a contract, does the collaboration have a written partnership plan?
No
Yes
NA
c. Are there written monitoring/oversight procedures?
No
Yes
NA
d. Are there written procedures for communication among partners?
No
Yes
NA
e. Is there a written cost allocation plan/budget for the collaboration?
No
Yes
NA
f. Is there a written training/professional development plan?
No
Yes
NA
g. Do job descriptions reflect staff' collaboration responsibilities?
No
Yes
NA
h. Is there a shared computerized MIS system?
No
Yes
NA
i. Do the partners share business operations & equipment costs?
No
Yes
NA
j. Do the partners purchase transportation jointly?
No
Yes
NA
k. Is there a competitive written RFP process for partner selection?
No
Yes
NA
l. Is there an ongoing advisory group for the collaboration?
No
Yes
NA
m. Did the partnership develop out of a broad based community planning process?
No
Yes
NA
n. Are parents involved in the collaboration planning & evaluation processes?
No
Yes
NA
o. Does the collaboration have a written evaluation process?
No
Yes
NA
p. Has the agency had any audit findings in the past 3 years?
No
Yes
NA
q. When was the agency's last federal monitoring review?________
Were there any problems identified?
No
Yes
NA
r. When was the agency's last licensing visit?________________
Were any problems identified?
No
Yes
NA
s. When was the agency's last DHS monitoring visit?_____________
Were any problems identified?
No
Yes
NA
11. Has the collaboration had an impact on the partner’s internal practices with regard to (check yes or no for each item):
a. Parent Decision Making
No
Yes
b. Parent Education
No
Yes
c. Parent Involvement
No
Yes
d. Family Support Services
No
Yes
e. Staff Salaries
No
Yes
f. Employee Benefits
No
Yes
g. Management Practices/Structure
No
Yes
h. Staff Training/Professional Development
No
Yes
12. Program Services (Make 2 checks for each item – 1 to indicate which partner is primarily responsible for direct service delivery and the other to indicate which children receive that service – all or just the collaboration children.)
Services Provided
Partner Responsible for Direct Service Delivery
Children Receiving Services
a. Child education services
E/HS
CC
PreK
Other
All
Collab
b. Family support services
E/HS
CC
PreK
Other
All
Collab
c. Health services
E/HS
CC
PreK
Other
All
Collab
d. Mental health services N.A.
E/HS
CC
PreK
Other
All
Collab
e. Parent education/involvement
E/HS
CC
PreK
Other
All
Collab
f. Transportation services
E/HS
CC
PreK
Other
All
Collab
g. Nutrition services
E/HS
CC
PreK
Other
All
Collab
h. Transition services N.A.
E/HS
CC
PreK
Other
All
Collab
i. Disabilities services
E/HS
CC
PreK
Other
All
Collab
j. Parent home visits
E/HS
CC
PreK
Other
All
Collab
k. Sick child care
E/HS
CC
PreK
Other
All
Collab
l. Parent conferences
E/HS
CC
PreK
Other
All
Collab
m. Non-traditional hours service
E/HS
CC
PreK
Other
All
Collab
13. Primary objectives for beginning this collaboration (check all that apply)
Enhance family health services
Enhance the quality of children’s education services
Expand services into new communities
Extend service hours
Improve & maximize staff training/professional development
Link early care & education systems in the community
Maximize funding and cost effectiveness
Maximize use of facilities
Offer increased service options
Offer parents home visits
Respond to parents’ changing needs
Serve a wider age range of children
Extend days of service
Serve siblings in one program
Provide more economically & culturally diverse programming
Increase the number of children served
Provide continuity of care
Improve staff compensation packages
14. Collaboration Development & Management
a. When did the collaboration begin?
2003
b. Are regular written management reports required to support the collaboration? If yes, explain below.
No
Yes
c. Are there regular required meetings between collaboration partners? If yes, explain below.
No
Yes
d. Is there written documentation to support the content of meetings?
No
Yes
e. Does the program/collaboration have a written planning process that includes all partners?
No
Yes
f. Does the collaboration have a written decision making process?
No
Yes
g. Why did the collaboration begin?
The ROE pulled together a small handful of early childhood providers to generally discuss common issues. Out of that our local Coalition was formed, which two years later decided to pool together and write the ECBG together, believing that “together we are better.”
h. How were partners selected?
Attitude, knowledge, willingness to work together, something to bring to the table. Then, each classroom of 20 PreK At Risk children was awarded on an RFP basis with outside objective readers of each application.
i. When there is a disagreement or conflict, how is it resolved with partners?
One of us calls for a meeting and it is talked through. We now have written by laws that address conflict resolution.
j. When a decision has to be made about the collaboration, how is this done with partners?
Follow Roberts Rules for voting - each partner has 1 vote
k. Explain how often reports & meetings are done/held:
Monthly meetings with Directors of the classrooms, monthly meetings of the oversight group and monthly meetings of the 04 teachers with the fiscal partner, ROE.
15. Program Components: Please answer the following questions about your collaboration program. Show in column 2 which partner is responsible for each program component. Check which children receive the program component in the last 2 columns - either all children in the classroom(s) or just the collaboration children.
Responsible Partner
Children Receiving Services
a. Does the program use a standardized curriculum?
If yes, which curriculum?
Creative Curriculum
No
Yes
All
Collab
b. Does the program do child screening?
If yes, what instrument is used? Ages/Stages
How often are screenings done?
annual/on enrollment
No
Yes
All
Collab
c. Does the program do ongoing child assessment? If yes, what instrument is used? Work Sampling
How often is assessment done? 2X/year year
No
Yes
All
Collab
d. Does the program take field trips? If yes, how often? 8X/year
No
Yes
All
Collab
e. Does the program have family support staff/case managers?
If yes, what is their caseload? :80
How often do they make home visits? 2X/year
How frequent are family contacts? weekly
No
Yes
All
Collab
f. BRIEFLY describe your collaboration program’s social service delivery, if you have one, for example explain your crisis intervention and/or referral process(es):
Skip-A-Long staffs a Family Service Provider who conducts enrollment, determines eligibility & links families to services. This person develops a relationship with the families. So in any time of family need, that staff is generally the individual that responds/meets with the family.
Answer the following questions IN AS FEW WORDS as possible, still giving a picture of how your collaboration works. Use bullet point lists whenever possible.
16. List/describe any other program components included in the collaboration that are not described in items 12 and 15 (pages 3-4).
Nurse on Staff; conduct separate outcomes measurement, assessing kindergarten readiness.
17. Please describe how budgeting and cost sharing among funding sources is done. How do you decide how costs will be shared? What are the financial arrangements between partners?
Partners discuss & determine their group/individual needs—come to consensus, draft the budget, which is then presented to the oversight committee. ROE secures the money and distributes according to budget to each classroom partner who is then responsible for proper documentation.
18. Please explain how your collaboration is staffed. Include classroom and support staff and tell how this is changed/different from your regular program. Who funds the staff’s salaries? Who supervises the staff and who employs them? What salaries and benefits are offered collaboration staff and is this different from other staff?
Collaboration homes have one 04 certified teacher that conducts two 1- hour sessions in each home each week, plus an extra 2.5 hour session per home every 4th week, in addition to regular staffing in the licensed homes. Skip-A-Long’s Home Network Director supervises both the certified teacher and the homes; ROE also supervises the certified teacher, who is paid a higher salary and receives greater benefits than regular child care.
19. Please tell about your written agreement, if you have one. Include: what the agreement covers (section titles); term (what the time period is); if finances are part of the agreement and how these were figured; etc.
Written agreement states the purpose, compliance, decision-making, management, equipment ownership, liability insurance, record keeping, monitoring/evaluation, public relations, conflict of interest, changes, dispute resolution, renewal/termination, notices - signed by all partners in the Coalition’s PreK collaboration. Program Policies and Procedures Manual addresses organization, curriculum and instruction, personnel, parents, assessment and accountability, early learning enhanced experience, staff development plan, division of responsibilities. Also have written salary agreement that the teaching staff and directors are required to sign in order to receive additional PreK pay for these additional duties. They are the ONLY child care staff whose salary is augmented with PreK funding.
20. Please describe the training system for your collaboration. Include what kind of training is done, how costs are shared among funding sources and/or partners, and how it has changed since the collaboration began.
Partners agree on training, presenters, & level needed at the beginning of the year. ROE coordinates training; each classroom partner pays their share. In the third year, the level of training has advanced because the staff knowledge base is increased, however, entry-level training is still offered for new staff. Training & staff development are one of the hallmarks of this collaboration’s success. Everyone has the opportunity to better their knowledge and apply it. Regular child care teachers received 60 clock hours last year on top of the regular 15 hours always provided. This professional development has stimulated staff to further their education.
21. Please give any other details about your collaboration that you believe are important, but not covered elsewhere.
Our collaboration is still so different and new to us as we are completely pooling our knowledge, resources to make this successful. We worked through our different perceptions and turf issues/barriers so that we are a diverse group functioning as one.
22. If you could start your collaboration over again, knowing what you know now, what would you do differently?
Clarify the roles of all partners; seek 501c3 status.
23. What advice do you have for agencies/homes starting new collaborations?
While it is more difficult and time consuming, I believe we offer a better service in the final analysis. Open and regular communications should be spelled out and adhered to. Seek out partners like and unlike you to bring diversity to the table. Take the opportunity to learn/share with one another.
Copyright 2005 Collaboration Model Description. Template.
HS State Collab Office.10.05