If this is an Early/Head Start collaboration, please indicate the program option & number of Early/Head start hours:
Family CC Home option; schedule isintegrated full day/full year
6. Number of Children Served Full-Day/Year by Location, Setting & Age
Setting includes: Head Start/Early Head Start site; Child care center; Family child care homes; Public/private school system; Other (explain/describe)
Location
Setting
# Infants
# Toddlers
# Preschool
All homes located in Evanston
Child care homes
17-6 wks to 2 yrs. CC/EHS
7 –2 yrs. to 3
CC/EHS
N/A
Location
Setting
# Infants
# Toddlers
# Preschool
7. Total number of children served by organization
0-150
151-500
501-2000
2001-6000
6001+
8. Total number of children served by partner’s organization (if applicable). Note: this means an early care & education partner with whom you are collaborating. Agencies that checked “One Agency, Multiple Funders” in question 1, page 1 of this survey will NOT complete this question.
0-50
51-150
151-300
301+
9. Funding used to support full-day/year services (Check all that apply.)
Federal Early/Head Start
State Early Childhood Block Grant from IL State Board of Education
State Early Childhood Block Grant from School District (including Chicago Public Schools)
State Child Care Assistance Program through contract with IL Dept. of Human Services
State Child Care Assistance Program through local Child Care Resource & Referral Agency certificate program
Parent Fees
Other (Specify): City of Evanston, United Way, CACFP, Donations and Private grants.
10. Administration/Management (Check either yes, no or not applicable – NA – for each item.)
a. Does the collaboration have a legal written agreement/contract?
No
Yes
NA
b. Other than a contract, does the collaboration have a written partnership plan?
No
Yes
NA
c. Are there written monitoring/oversight procedures?
No
Yes
NA
d. Are there written procedures for communication among partners?
No
Yes
NA
e. Is there a written cost allocation plan/budget for the collaboration?
No
Yes
NA
f. Is there a written training/professional development plan?
No
Yes
NA
g. Do job descriptions reflect staff' collaboration responsibilities?
No
Yes
NA
h. Is there a shared computerized MIS system?
No
Yes
NA
i. Do the partners share business operations & equipment costs?
No
Yes
NA
j. Do the partners purchase transportation jointly?
No
Yes
NA
k. Is there a competitive written RFP process for partner selection?
No
Yes
NA
l. Is there an ongoing advisory group for the collaboration?
No
Yes
NA
m. Did the partnership develop out of a broad based community planning process?
No
Yes
NA
n. Are parents involved in the collaboration planning & evaluation processes?
No
Yes
NA
o. Does the collaboration have a written evaluation process?
No
Yes
NA
p. Has the agency had any audit findings in the past 3 years?
No
Yes
NA
q. When was the agency's last federal monitoring review? 11/04
Were there any problems identified?
No
Yes
NA
r. When was the agency's last licensing visit?________________
Were any problems identified?
No
Yes
NA
s. When was the agency's last DHS monitoring visit? 7/26/05
Were any problems identified?
No
Yes
NA
11. Has the collaboration had an impact on the partner’s internal practices with regard to (check yes or no for each item):
a. Parent Decision Making
No
Yes
b. Parent Education
No
Yes
c. Parent Involvement
No
Yes
d. Family Support Services
No
Yes
e. Staff Salaries
No
Yes
f. Employee Benefits
No
Yes
g. Management Practices/Structure
No
Yes
h. Staff Training/Professional Development
No
Yes
12. Program Services (Make 2 checks for each item – 1 to indicate which partner is primarily responsible for direct service delivery and the other to indicate which children receive that service – all or just the collaboration children.)
Services Provided
Partner Responsible for Direct Service Delivery
Children Receiving Services
a. Child education services
E/HS
CC
PreK
Other
All
Collab
b. Family support services
E/HS
CC
PreK
Other
All
Collab
c. Health services
E/HS
CC
PreK
Other
All
Collab
d. Mental health services
E/HS
CC
PreK
Other
All
Collab
e. Parent education/involvement
E/HS
CC
PreK
Other
All
Collab
f. Transportation services
N/A
CC
PreK
Other
All
N/A
g. Nutrition services
E/HS
CC
PreK
Other
All
Collab
h. Transition services
E/HS
CC
PreK
Other
All
Collab
i. Disabilities services
E/HS
CC
PreK
Other
All
Collab
j. Parent home visits
E/HS
CC
PreK
Other
All
Collab
k. Sick child care
N/A
CC
PreK
Other
All
N/A
l. Parent conferences
E/HS
CC
PreK
Other
All
Collab
m. Non-traditional hours service
N/A
CC
PreK
Other
All
N/A
13. Primary objectives for beginning this collaboration (check all that apply)
Enhance family health services
Enhance the quality of children’s education services
Expand services into new communities
Extend service hours
Improve & maximize staff training/professional development
Link early care & education systems in the community
Maximize funding and cost effectiveness
Maximize use of facilities
Offer increased service options
Offer parents home visits
Respond to parents’ changing needs
Serve a wider age range of children
Extend days of service
Serve siblings in one program
Provide more economically & culturally diverse programming
Increase the number of children served
Provide continuity of care
Improve staff compensation packages
14. Collaboration Development & Management
a. When did the collaboration begin?
September 1998
b. Are regular written management reports required to support the collaboration? If yes, explain below.
No
Yes
c. Are there regular required meetings between collaboration partners? If yes, explain below.
No
Yes
d. Is there written documentation to support the content of meetings?
No
Yes
e. Does the program/collaboration have a written planning process that includes all partners?
No
Yes
f. Does the collaboration have a written decision making process?
No
Yes
g. Why did the collaboration begin? To enhance services to infant and toddlers and their families
h. How were partners selected? Two existing quality full-day, full-year childcare programs which were already serving majority of low income families of infants and toddlers partnered to enhance already existing services.
i. When there is a disagreement or conflict, how is it resolved with partners? Conflicts are addressed at administrative meetings between Grantee staff and Partner Directors and/or staff. If the conflict is not resolved, it is presented to the Policy Council and/or Grantee Board.
j. When a decision has to be made about the collaboration, how is this done with partners? Program decisions are discussed and planned at monthly Administrative meetings involving Grantee staff and partnering staff. All policy and/or program changes are required to be approved by the Policy Council. Partnering agency boards meet at least annually to discuss any changes that may affect the collaboration.
k. Explain how often reports & meetings are done/held: Monthly Administrative meetings; Monthly Financial and attendance reports; Monthly Multidisciplinary meetings.
15. Program Components: Please answer the following questions about your collaboration program. Show in column 2 which partner is responsible for each program component. Check which children receive the program component in the last 2 columns - either all children in the classroom(s) or just the collaboration children.
Responsible Partner
Children Receiving Services
a. Does the program use a standardized curriculum?
If yes, which curriculum?______________
No
Yes
All
Collab
b. Does the program do child screening?
If yes, what instrument is used? Denver, Ages & Stages and The Sooner the Better (social/emotional)
How often are screenings done? At least twice yearly
No
Yes
All
Collab
c. Does the program do ongoing child assessment? If yes, what instrument is used? Bayley
How often is assessment done? As needed
No
Yes
All
Collab
d. Does the program take field trips? If yes, how often? _____________________
No
Yes
All
Collab
e. Does the program have family support staff/case managers? Grantee employs family support staff
If yes, what is their caseload? Max. 30
How often do they make home visits? At least 1per year
How frequent are family contacts? Varies
No
Yes
All
Collab
f. BRIEFLY describe your collaboration program’s social service delivery, if you have one, for example explain your crisis intervention and/or referral process(es):
All social service referrals are made to appropriate staff at the Childcare Network of Evanston/Grantee.
Health/Nutrition, Developmental intervention, Mental Health services and Family Support.
If necessary, Grantee staff will refer families to other social services partnering agencies.
Answer the following questions IN AS FEW WORDS as possible, still giving a picture of how your collaboration works. Use bullet point lists whenever possible.
16. List/describe any other program components included in the collaboration that are not described in items 12 and 15 (pages 3-4).
). The Evanston Early Head Start (EEHS) collaboration consists of three programs: Child Care Center of Evanston Home Day Care Program/5 Family Childcare Homes – Partner Agency; Infant Welfare Society/Baby Toddler Nursery and Teen Baby Nursery (Center Based) – Partner Agency; Childcare Network of Evanston/Grantee.
17. Please describe how budgeting and cost sharing among funding sources is done. How do you decide how costs will be shared? What are the financial arrangements between partners?
Pro rated system based on childcare enrollment at partnering agencies.
Partner collaboration budgets are submitted to Grantee annually for approval.
Monthly financial reports are submitted.
18. Please explain how your collaboration is staffed. Include classroom and support staff and tell how this is changed/different from your regular program. Who funds the staff’s salaries? Who supervises the staff and who employs them? What salaries and benefits are offered collaboration staff and is this different from other staff?
Each partnering agency employs it’s own staff. EHS Family Childcare Providers are paid at a higher rate than non-EHS providers and receive additional payments for program supplies and continuing education and training. Grantee employs support staff for EEHS. Partners have individual supervisory oversight and individual salary/benefit packages.
Childcare Network of Evanston/Grantee monitors the two partner’s EHS portion of their programs
19. Please tell about your written agreement, if you have one. Include: what the agreement covers (section titles); term (what the time period is); if finances are part of the agreement and how these were figured; etc.
Agreement covers: Contract documents; Role of Grantee; Role of EEHS Partners; Purchase of services; Term of contract; Required record keeping and reporting, standards, rules and regulations; Term – Annual. Refer question 17 for how finances were figured.
20. Please describe the training system for your collaboration. Include what kind of training is done, how costs are shared among funding sources and/or partners, and how it has changed since the collaboration began.
Grantee is responsible for annual training of partner staff of Head Start Performance Standards. Content area managers are responsible for specific trainings.
Grantee agrees to assist in obtaining further educational opportunities for Early Childhood Professional Development and EHS administrative training
21. Please give any other details about your collaboration that you believe are important, but not covered elsewhere.
22. If you could start your collaboration over again, knowing what you know now, what would you do differently?
Make sure that all partnering agencies/staff are well informed about policies, procedures and requirements of the program. Make sure that there are clear and written procedures for communication and decision-making.
Make sure that each partnering agency clearly understands their role within the collaboration.
23. What advice do you have for agencies/homes starting new collaborations?
Collaborate with strong partners
Develop functional processes and systems prior to implementation of collaboration
Copyright 2005 Collaboration Model Description. Template.
HS State Collab Office.10.05